next up previous
Next: Size Limitations and Expansion Up: Correlator Specifications Previous: Basebands per Antenna

Number of Channels (Spectral Points)

The correlator design provides 2048 hardware lags for every baseline (1024 lead and 1024 lag multipliers). These lags can be apportioned amongst different basebands and polarization products (up to a maximum of 16 ways) in powers of 2. Each spectrum computed, corresponding to a single baseband/polarization product, would then have between 2048 and 128 lags, resulting in from 1024 to 64 channels (spectral points). This allows one to trade polarization products or basebands for channels (frequency resolution) in a fairly flexible way. One can also obtain an increase in the number of channels by reducing the input bandwidth into a sampler.

When used at the maximum bandwidth, full polarization, the correlator provides 64 spectral points (channels) across each of the 16 products (2 cross-hand and 2 parallel-hand polarization products for each of 4 BB pairs) for every baseline. There would thus be 256 channels across the entire 8 GHz band, corresponding to a resolution of 31.25 MHz.

Polarization products can be traded for channels (on a BB-by-BB basis). Thus one can double the number of channels (halve the frequency resolution) by producing only the parallel-hand products (XX, YY); or even gain a factor of 4, by producing only one of the parallel-hand products (e.g., XX). Similarly, using fewer BBs increases the number of channels proportionately. And finally, halving the bandwidth of each BB increases the number of channels proportionately, up to a maximum of a factor 32.gif

A few examples should clarify all this.

A.
16 GHz, single polarization: If the IF system could produce 16 GHz of one polarization, say X, in eight 2 GHz basebands, the 2048 correlator lags would be allocated evenly amongst those 8 BBs, giving a total of 1024 channels (128 per BB). The resolution would then be 16 GHz/1024 channels= 2 GHz/128 channels= 15.625 MHz/channel.

B.
8 GHz: Here one has 4 BB pairs, each covering 2 GHz in dual polarization.

C.
4 GHz, full pol'n products: In this case one could split the total bandwidth either between 2 BB pairs, each 2 GHz wide; or 4 BB pairs, each 1 GHz wide. In other words, because of the ability to recirculate signals when the samplers are run below their maximum rate of 4 Gsamples/sec, one always gains by splitting a given total bandwidth among the maximum number of basebands. Whether one would always want to do this, and to what extent this might argue for making the correlator smaller by employing more than eight basebands, is discussed in §3.4.

D.
The highest possible frequency resolution:

E.
1 GHz total bandwidth, full polarization products: To maximize the number of channels, one would use 4 BB pairs, each covering 250 MHz. The 2048 hardware lags would be split among 16 spectra, while recirculation would increase the number of channels by a factor 2 GHz/250 MHz= 8, yielding 512 channels (spectral points) per 250 MHz, or a total of 2048 channels over 1 GHz. If on the other hand one required the full 1 GHz within a single baseband pair, for instance to avoid calibration difficulties in splitting a single broad line up into several basebands, recirculation would only give a factor 2 (rather than 8), and one would obtain only 512 channels over 1 GHz.

The astute reader will have noticed that all the tradeoffs discussed so far have involved factors of two (halving the bandwidth or the number of basebands; asking for two rather than four correlator products). This is probably not absolutely necessary, but allowing for other than binary trade-offs would force one to support an even larger number of modes, making the correlator even more complex. So far there has been no compelling scientific argument that the additional flexibility would be worth it.

The correlator modes used to process each baseband or baseband pair can be selected independently. Such (sub-)modes should also be powers of 2 (instead of 7 basebands at one resolution and 1 at another, each sub-mode should use 1/8, 1/4, or 1/2 of the correlator), and to avoid complexity the current design envisions a maximum of four different sub-modes in use at the same time. Some examples of this are:

F.
Cover 4 GHz with full polarization (2 BB pairs), and another 4 GHz with parallel-hand polarization products only (2 BB pairs). Each BB pair has 2048/4=512 hardware lags available. So in this mode the correlator would produce full polarization products for tex2html_wrap_inline298 channels, and parallel-hand products for another tex2html_wrap_inline300 channels.
G.
Use 3 BB pairs to cover 6 GHz, producing full polarization products; use one of the remaining BBs to cover 500 MHz, producing a single polarization product (e.g., XX). In this way the correlator would produce XX, YY, XY, and YX for each of tex2html_wrap_inline302 channels covering 6 GHz, plus e.g. XX alone for another tex2html_wrap_inline304 channels covering 500 MHz.
H.
Suppose one wants to do a survey over 500 MHz producing YY only, while observing one transition in dual polarization over 250 MHz and another over 62.5 MHz; meanwhile one wishes also to zoom in on the central MHz of one of these transitions for an experiment requiring all polarization products. This might be organized as follows:

Table 1 summarizes these examples.


next up previous
Next: Size Limitations and Expansion Up: Correlator Specifications Previous: Basebands per Antenna

Kate Weatherall