Next: About this document
Up: MMA Memo 170 System
Previous: Continuum Measurements
- We demonstrate that with respect to the signal sideband, DSB
observations are noisier than SSB observations by the term (Equation
11)
- Using DSB systems, spectroscopists often analyze lines in both
sidebands. Above certain levels of antenna and atmospheric noise, it
may be more efficient to perform two SSB observations rather than one
simultaneous DSB observation if SSB capability is available. In terms
of receiver temperature, we show that the break-even point is given by
(Equation 17)
Below this receiver temperature, sky and antenna noise dominate and SSB
mode is always more efficient.
- Receiver noise temperatures are improving year-by-year and some
devices are already within a factor of a few of the quantum noise
limit. Because of the presence of atmospheric and antenna noise, we
may soon reach the point of diminishing returns in further lowering
receiver noise temperature. Parametrically, we show that the
acceptable lower limit for receiver DSB noise temperature can be
written as (Equation 22)
where n is the degradation factor in observing speed that
we are willing to tolerate over a quantum-limited receiver. An
appropriate choice for n might be 2. In the 230 GHz band, the
``acceptable Trx'' is about twice the quantum limit; in the 650 GHz
band, it is about 3.6 times the quantum limit.
- We emphasize that keeping antenna spillover losses to a minimum
pays large dividends for any system and that keeping the image
termination temperature as low as possible is critical for SSB
systems. We also emphasize that among ways to achieve lower noise, a
dual polarization system usually leads to the most improvement.
- We show that for the anticipated MMA antenna parameters and
atmospheric transparencies appropriate to good weather on the Chilean
or Mauna Kea sites, SSB systems offer observing speed improvements
over DSB systems of 50% at 230 GHz, >85% at 345 GHz, and
over a factor of 2 above 400 GHz.
- We note that for single-dish mode, which the MMA is also
intended to support, SSB systems are often important for improving
calibration and reducing spectral confusion from the image sideband.
The latter point is not an issue in interferometer mode as the
sidebands can be separated by phase switching.
- Below 300 GHz, the noise advantage of SSB systems is perhaps
marginal, at least under the best skies and assuming that the
specified antenna performance is achieved.
However, the DSB-to-SSB integration time ratio is a steeply rising
function at low opacity. Thus, if weather conditions deteriorate even
slightly, the SSB advantage grows rapidly. Above 300 GHz, the noise
advantage of SSB-mode observing is almost always significant.
- Given the advantage to single dish observing and the noise
improvement above 300 GHz, we conclude that development work to
achieve a SSB capability for the MMA is well-justified.
Next: About this document
Up: MMA Memo 170 System
Previous: Continuum Measurements
Jeff Mangum